DianQK added a comment. In D157227#4564817 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D157227#4564817>, @nikic wrote:
> Removing noundef makes no sense to me, because the return value is noundef > even under fno-exceptions. If we remove something, it should be the nonnull > attribute, because that's what's actually being violated. Return null on nonnull is poison. So I can also think that the noundef attribute is violated. I think the reason for keeping nonnull is to match the semantics of `operator new`. But that probably doesn't make sense either. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D157227/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D157227 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
