PiotrZSL created this revision.
PiotrZSL added reviewers: njames93, carlosgalvezp.
Herald added a subscriber: xazax.hun.
Herald added a project: All.
PiotrZSL requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: clang-tools-extra.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.

Use isStatic instead of isStaticStorageClass to properly
handle a out-of-line definitions.

Fixes: #51861


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D157326

Files:
  
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck.cpp
  clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
  
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/static-accessed-through-instance.cpp


Index: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/static-accessed-through-instance.cpp
===================================================================
--- 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/static-accessed-through-instance.cpp
+++ 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/static-accessed-through-instance.cpp
@@ -363,3 +363,20 @@
 }
 
 } // namespace llvm_issue_61736
+
+namespace PR51861 {
+  class Foo {
+    public:
+      static Foo& getInstance();
+      static int getBar();
+  };
+
+  inline int Foo::getBar() { return 42; }
+
+  void test() {
+    auto& params = Foo::getInstance();
+    params.getBar();
+    // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: static member accessed through 
instance [readability-static-accessed-through-instance]
+    // CHECK-FIXES: {{^}}    PR51861::Foo::getBar();{{$}}
+  }
+}
Index: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -192,6 +192,10 @@
   <clang-tidy/checks/readability/identifier-naming>` check to emit proper
   warnings when a type forward declaration precedes its definition.
 
+- Improved :doc:`readability-static-accessed-through-instance
+  <clang-tidy/checks/readability/static-accessed-through-instance>` check to
+  identify calls to static member functions with out-of-class inline 
definitions.
+
 Removed checks
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
Index: 
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck.cpp
===================================================================
--- 
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck.cpp
+++ 
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck.cpp
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
 
 namespace clang::tidy::readability {
 
+namespace {
+AST_MATCHER(CXXMethodDecl, isStatic) { return Node.isStatic(); }
+} // namespace
+
 static unsigned getNameSpecifierNestingLevel(const QualType &QType) {
   if (const ElaboratedType *ElType = QType->getAs<ElaboratedType>()) {
     if (const NestedNameSpecifier *NestedSpecifiers = ElType->getQualifier()) {
@@ -38,7 +42,7 @@
 
 void StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) 
{
   Finder->addMatcher(
-      memberExpr(hasDeclaration(anyOf(cxxMethodDecl(isStaticStorageClass()),
+      memberExpr(hasDeclaration(anyOf(cxxMethodDecl(isStatic()),
                                       varDecl(hasStaticStorageDuration()),
                                       enumConstantDecl())))
           .bind("memberExpression"),


Index: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/static-accessed-through-instance.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/static-accessed-through-instance.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/static-accessed-through-instance.cpp
@@ -363,3 +363,20 @@
 }
 
 } // namespace llvm_issue_61736
+
+namespace PR51861 {
+  class Foo {
+    public:
+      static Foo& getInstance();
+      static int getBar();
+  };
+
+  inline int Foo::getBar() { return 42; }
+
+  void test() {
+    auto& params = Foo::getInstance();
+    params.getBar();
+    // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: static member accessed through instance [readability-static-accessed-through-instance]
+    // CHECK-FIXES: {{^}}    PR51861::Foo::getBar();{{$}}
+  }
+}
Index: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -192,6 +192,10 @@
   <clang-tidy/checks/readability/identifier-naming>` check to emit proper
   warnings when a type forward declaration precedes its definition.
 
+- Improved :doc:`readability-static-accessed-through-instance
+  <clang-tidy/checks/readability/static-accessed-through-instance>` check to
+  identify calls to static member functions with out-of-class inline definitions.
+
 Removed checks
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
Index: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck.cpp
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
 
 namespace clang::tidy::readability {
 
+namespace {
+AST_MATCHER(CXXMethodDecl, isStatic) { return Node.isStatic(); }
+} // namespace
+
 static unsigned getNameSpecifierNestingLevel(const QualType &QType) {
   if (const ElaboratedType *ElType = QType->getAs<ElaboratedType>()) {
     if (const NestedNameSpecifier *NestedSpecifiers = ElType->getQualifier()) {
@@ -38,7 +42,7 @@
 
 void StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
   Finder->addMatcher(
-      memberExpr(hasDeclaration(anyOf(cxxMethodDecl(isStaticStorageClass()),
+      memberExpr(hasDeclaration(anyOf(cxxMethodDecl(isStatic()),
                                       varDecl(hasStaticStorageDuration()),
                                       enumConstantDecl())))
           .bind("memberExpression"),
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to