aaron.ballman added a comment. In D153156#4607576 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153156#4607576>, @hans wrote:
> Given the concerns raised (the PRIuS one in https://godbolt.org/z/v3boc9E6T > seems like a good example), and that the fix in D158372 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158372> doesn't seem straight-forward, could this > be reverted to unbreak things until a revised version is ready? > > @aaron.ballman what do you think? I agree this should be reverted from 17.x so we have more time to consider an appropriate path forward. Supporting evidence that this will likely be disruptive: https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+%5E%28%22%5B%5E%22%5D%2B%22PRI.*%29%24+lang:C%2B%2B+-file:.*test.*&patternType=regexp&case=yes&sm=0&groupBy=repo Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D153156/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D153156 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
