vgvassilev wrote: > @vgvassilev If that is an acceptable interface for the LLVM interface then, > yes, it would be perfect from our side, and I'm more than happy to update the > PR in the next few days. > > Just to be sure that I understood your proposal. > > `getFullyQualified*` calls will accept a new parameter, a callable, that will > be passed down the call chain up to > `createNestedNameSpecifierForScopeOf(const ASTContext &, const Decl *, ...)` > and will be called when the teplate case is encountered? Or are you thinking > more of a callable that replaces the call to > `createNestedNameSpecifierForScopeOf(const ASTContext &, const Decl *, ...)`?
I hesitate. Maybe we can pass a custom "policy" option and incorporate your code in there... We reiterate if the solution does not look good? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67566 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
