vgvassilev wrote:

> @vgvassilev If that is an acceptable interface for the LLVM interface then, 
> yes, it would be perfect from our side, and I'm more than happy to update the 
> PR in the next few days.
> Just to be sure that I understood your proposal.
> `getFullyQualified*` calls will accept a new parameter, a callable, that will 
> be passed down the call chain up to 
> `createNestedNameSpecifierForScopeOf(const ASTContext &, const Decl *, ...)` 
> and will be called when the teplate case is encountered? Or are you thinking 
> more of a callable that replaces the call to 
> `createNestedNameSpecifierForScopeOf(const ASTContext &, const Decl *, ...)`?

I hesitate. Maybe we can pass a custom "policy" option and incorporate your 
code in there... We reiterate if the solution does not look good?
cfe-commits mailing list

Reply via email to