diseraluca wrote: > > @vgvassilev If that is an acceptable interface for the LLVM interface then, > > yes, it would be perfect from our side, and I'm more than happy to update > > the PR in the next few days. > > Just to be sure that I understood your proposal. > > `getFullyQualified*` calls will accept a new parameter, a callable, that > > will be passed down the call chain up to > > `createNestedNameSpecifierForScopeOf(const ASTContext &, const Decl *, > > ...)` and will be called when the teplate case is encountered? Or are you > > thinking more of a callable that replaces the call to > > `createNestedNameSpecifierForScopeOf(const ASTContext &, const Decl *, > > ...)`? > > I hesitate. Maybe we can pass a custom "policy" option and incorporate your > code in there... We reiterate if the solution does not look good?
>From our point of view any solution is acceptable. But do note that from our >side it is not so much about incorporating custom code as much as removing >that specific behavior at this point in time. Could you expand about the policy? Are you talking about a "printing policy" or a custom policy for `getFullyQualified`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67566 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
