MaskRay wrote: > @zygoloid Thanks for the explanation! I wasn't aware this fell under > unspecified behavior. It's weird that alignment information can survive a > `void *` cast, but it does make some sense.
Yes, `(void *)x` decreases the alignment requirement to 1 byte like `(char *)x`. > What seems worrying here is that apparently GCC and Clang do not agree on > semantics in this case > ([godbolt.org/z/1r9df5a4a](https://godbolt.org/z/1r9df5a4a)). GCC does not > assume that the pointers are aligned. The perils of unspecified behavior.... Yes... I am out of town and will merge this PR later. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67766 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
