Had a look at the C99 spec, according to section 7.18.1.1 ("Exact-width
integer types"), the types uint<N>_t should be available in stdint.h
itself, inttypes.h on the other hand builds on stdint.h and provides more
functionality.I don't see a particular need to include inttypes.h here? Cheers, / Asiri On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:32:24PM -0000, Asiri Rathnayake via cfe-commits > wrote: > > This missing include seems to cause compilation failures on older MacOS > > versions (< 10.9). This is because r270692 has introduced uint64_t into > > config.h without including this header. > > But that would be inttypes.h, wouldn't it be? > > Joerg > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
