arphaman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25520#569389, @akyrtzi wrote:
> > What do you think of the following possible priority heuristic > > SGTM. > > Changes LGTM. I'd also recommend that as a follow-up patch it would be great > to extend the setter completion to variables as well (global variables, > fields, ivars, etc.) Thanks, I will commit this as it is. I will post a follow-up patch that uses the priority heuristic that I described above, and will work on related patches that you mentioned as well. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D25520 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
