jplehr wrote:

> > Is the approach taken in this approach acceptable as opposed to the header 
> > solution I put up earlier?
> 
> Yes, it's pretty much exactly what I had in mind from my suggestion in the 
> last PR. Thanks.

Perfect. I'll go ahead and add lit and runtime tests.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76571
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to