urnathan wrote:

> On the target hook, it's a shame we can't easily get this information from 
> LLVM. I believe it's already there — `TargetLowering` has an 
> `allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses` method that includes some approximation of 
> how fast a particular access would be. In practice, it seems to be quite 
> complex and often specific to the type and subtarget. Maybe it'd be worth 
> starting a conversation with LLVM folks to see if this could reasonably be 
> lifted somewhere we could use it?

Agreed, I did look at that, and AFAICT the allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess is a 
property of the llvm subtarget, which can, IIUC, change on a per-function 
basis? One at least needs a function codegen context around? And, clang needs 
to generate the llvm-structure in non-function contexts (eg namespace-scope 
variables). I'd really like to not tangle this particular change with a complex 
reorg.  

I had a discourse thread at, 
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/targetinfo-for-unaligned-load-capability/72832 
about such a target hook.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65742
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to