github-actions[bot] wrote: <!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: <details> <summary> You can test this locally with the following command: </summary> ``````````bash git-clang-format --diff 8cfb71613c452dd45a84a74affe8464bfd33de02 b4cb8945224633fef27b69f0eed34f505032f76e -- clang/test/CodeGen/aapcs-bitfield-access-unit.c clang/test/CodeGen/bitfield-access-pad.c clang/test/CodeGen/bitfield-access-unit.c clang/test/CodeGenCXX/bitfield-access-empty.cpp clang/test/CodeGenCXX/bitfield-access-tail.cpp clang/test/CodeGenCXX/bitfield-ir.cpp clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h clang/lib/Basic/TargetInfo.cpp clang/lib/Basic/Targets/AArch64.cpp clang/lib/Basic/Targets/AArch64.h clang/lib/Basic/Targets/ARM.cpp clang/lib/Basic/Targets/ARM.h clang/lib/Basic/Targets/LoongArch.cpp clang/lib/Basic/Targets/LoongArch.h clang/lib/Basic/Targets/Mips.h clang/lib/Basic/Targets/PPC.h clang/lib/Basic/Targets/SystemZ.h clang/lib/Basic/Targets/VE.h clang/lib/Basic/Targets/WebAssembly.h clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h clang/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp clang/test/CodeGen/aapcs-bitfield.c clang/test/CodeGen/arm-bitfield-alignment.c clang/test/CodeGen/arm64-be-bitfield.c clang/test/CodeGen/bitfield-2.c clang/test/CodeGen/debug-info-bitfield-0-struct.c clang/test/CodeGen/no-bitfield-type-align.c clang/test/CodeGen/struct-x86-darwin.c clang/test/CodeGenCXX/bitfield.cpp clang/test/OpenMP/atomic_capture_codegen.cpp clang/test/OpenMP/atomic_read_codegen.c clang/test/OpenMP/atomic_update_codegen.cpp clang/test/OpenMP/atomic_write_codegen.c `````````` </details> <details> <summary> View the diff from clang-format here. </summary> ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h b/clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h index aab571e1d2..c046cab93d 100644 --- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h +++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h @@ -863,9 +863,7 @@ public: /// Return true, iff unaligned accesses are a single instruction (rather than /// a synthesized sequence). - bool hasUnalignedAccess() const { - return HasUnalignedAccess; - } + bool hasUnalignedAccess() const { return HasUnalignedAccess; } /// \brief Returns the default value of the __USER_LABEL_PREFIX__ macro, /// which is the prefix given to user symbols by default. `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65742 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits