Prazek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29151#656887, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> General question: isn't Static Analyzer is better place for such workflow > checks? Probably yes, but it is much harder to implement this there. Other problem is that it would be probably a part of one of the alpha checks, that are not developed and I don't know if they will ever be fully supported. ================ Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/InvalidatedIteratorsCheck.h:35 + + // Returns the clang-tidy matcher binding to the possibly invalidating uses + // of the container (either invoking a dangerous member call or calling ---------------- drop clang-tidy. It's cleaner ================ Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/InvalidatedIteratorsCheck.h:37 + // of the container (either invoking a dangerous member call or calling + // another function with a non-const reference.) + ExprMatcherType getModifyingMatcher(const VarDecl *VectorDecl); ---------------- ). Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D29151 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
