Eugene.Zelenko added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29151#657435, @Prazek wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29151#656887, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > > > General question: isn't Static Analyzer is better place for such workflow > > checks? > > > Probably yes, but it is much harder to implement this there. Other problem is > that it would be probably a part > of one of the alpha checks, that are not developed and I don't know if they > will ever be fully supported. But it'll be necessary to re-implement part of Static Analyzer functionality in Clang-tidy. Will it be generic enough to be used for similar purposes? It'll be good idea to find out Static Analyzer release criteria. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D29151 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
