================
@@ -1825,6 +1825,37 @@ static ExprResult PointerAuthStringDiscriminator(Sema
&S, CallExpr *Call) {
return Call;
}
+static ExprResult GetVTablePointer(Sema &S, CallExpr *Call) {
+ if (S.checkArgCount(Call, 1))
+ return ExprError();
+ ExprResult ThisArg = S.DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion(Call->getArg(0));
+ if (ThisArg.isInvalid())
+ return ExprError();
+ Call->setArg(0, ThisArg.get());
+ const Expr *Subject = Call->getArg(0);
+ QualType SubjectType = Subject->getType();
+ const CXXRecordDecl *SubjectRecord = SubjectType->getPointeeCXXRecordDecl();
+ if (!SubjectType->isPointerType() || !SubjectRecord) {
+ S.Diag(Subject->getBeginLoc(), diag::err_get_vtable_pointer_incorrect_type)
+ << 0 << SubjectType;
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
We don't use = there (or not consistently). The important bit is to know what's
happening.
You could look into `%enum_select` as a better solution
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139790
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
