smeenai added a comment. @compnerd see my previous comment:
> @EricWF and I discussed this on IRC a bit. I'm not a fan of overloading > _LIBCPP_WIN32API for this purpose, since to me that macro is meant for > guarding Windows API functions, not for CRT functions. Eric suggested adding > a new macro _LIBCPP_MSVCRT_LIKE, which I'd be fine with. `_LIBCPP_MSVCRT` isn't defined for MinGW (since they have their own CRT headers), so we need a new macro that's defined for both MSVCRT and MinGW. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33082 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
