bcraig added a comment. > Are you suggesting that libc++ should stop declaring/defining these > functions, at least publically?
I think that we generally shouldn't be giving functions names that are already claimed elsewhere (like mbsnrtowcs and wcsnrtombs). It is my opinion that these should always be qualified as __libcpp_* symbols. We can easily run into trouble if users also defined mbsnrtowcs. They have just as much of a right to do so as we do. That being said, I think that's a change for a different changelist. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33082 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
