erichkeane wrote:

> Just to be precise, it's not the number of items but the number of trailing 
> types. I half expected the comment to make it a different function. I'll do 
> that

Ah right, I was using 'items' to mean 'types' too, so we were clear there :)  
Sorry for my lack of precision.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144930
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to