================ @@ -291,6 +292,13 @@ static void ProcessAPINotes(Sema &S, Decl *D, }); } + // swift_safety + if (auto SafetyKind = Info.getSwiftSafety(); + SafetyKind != api_notes::SwiftSafetyKind::None) + D->addAttr(SwiftAttrAttr::Create( + S.Context, + SafetyKind == api_notes::SwiftSafetyKind::Safe ? "safe" : "unsafe")); ---------------- egorzhdan wrote:
Nice! > I am not sure if unspecified should have the semantics of removing > safe/unsafe annotations. I think it would make sense to be consistent with the nullability annotations here. I wonder if e.g. overriding the nullability specifier of a function parameter via API Notes would have a similar effect. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157506 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits