jmmartinez wrote: Just to propose another approach to the problem, it really looks like the issue is mainly a naming issue more than anything.
We could rename `UnqualPtrTy` to `DefaultPtrTy` or `GenericPtrTy` which would be closer to its current meaning. If some part of clang really needs the address-space 0 pointer, it can still use `PointerType::getUnqual`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163207 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
