ruiu added a comment. Looks like this demangler's design is similar to my demangler for Microsoft name mangling scheme (https://reviews.llvm.org/D34667). Is that a coincidence? Both demanglers create AST, stringize it using print_left/print_right (I named them write_pre/write_post), and use custom memory allocator. Looks like both demangler can share more code once both land.
Do you think you can avoid STL containers so that your demangler don't need any destructors? I observed that that makes my demangler faster. https://reviews.llvm.org/D35159 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
