=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
vbvictor wrote: > Do we have any precedent for this "alias for a combination of checkers" > situation? AFAIK we don't. We will need to adjust check registration code to support this. We can probably make 2 aliases like cert-dcl56-1-cpp and cert-dcl56-2-cpp for now.. but tbh this seems ugly. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175342 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
