evelez7 wrote: > @evelez7 am I forgetting some plans issues we've discussed previously?
Petr mentioned a configuration file before. I generally agree and opened #181768 just to track it, but I would put it near the bottom of current clang-doc needs/issues. I think Petr mentioned it because celery-doc has a lot of options specified that would be nice to have (ignore certain paths, etc) and that would be nicer to have in a file for reuse. I don't think we should be making design decisions around it yet or for the near future. > any preferences? I'm actually a bit surprised to see that the "one param per line" design is so common https://docs.hdoc.io/hdoc/llvm-project/rD85AF4A2A9884C1C.html#83C1C7AF36ACD866 Doxygen does the same thing. I think for simplicity sake going with the convention would be best. It's an overall improvement compared to what we see in Fuschia. If this was pure HTML/CSS to determine wrapping, I would've suggested doing more complicated wrapping. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/181417 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
