================
@@ -5379,6 +5379,30 @@ def HLSLDdyFine : LangBuiltin<"HLSL_LANG"> {
let Prototype = "void(...)";
}
+def HLSLInterlockedOr : LangBuiltin<"HLSL_LANG"> {
+ let Spellings = ["__builtin_hlsl_interlocked_or"];
+ let Attributes = [NoThrow, CustomTypeChecking];
+ let Prototype = "void(...)";
+}
+
+def HLSLInterlockedOrRet : LangBuiltin<"HLSL_LANG"> {
+ let Spellings = ["__builtin_hlsl_interlocked_or_ret"];
+ let Attributes = [NoThrow, CustomTypeChecking];
+ let Prototype = "void(...)";
+}
+
+def HLSLInterlockedOr64 : LangBuiltin<"HLSL_LANG"> {
+ let Spellings = ["__builtin_hlsl_interlocked_or64"];
+ let Attributes = [NoThrow, CustomTypeChecking];
+ let Prototype = "void(...)";
+}
+
+def HLSLInterlockedOrRet64 : LangBuiltin<"HLSL_LANG"> {
+ let Spellings = ["__builtin_hlsl_interlocked_or_ret64"];
+ let Attributes = [NoThrow, CustomTypeChecking];
+ let Prototype = "void(...)";
+}
----------------
farzonl wrote:
ok yeah I think it should be fine to have one builtin that returns and one that
does not return. I don't see that we do much via signed vs unsigned as we
are just using one dxil op for this in the backend.
Also bitness specific builtins is not something we have done yet and I'm not
sure I want this to be a pattern that gets copied.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180804
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
