================
@@ -1655,6 +1655,15 @@ void CodeGenFunction::GenerateCode(GlobalDecl GD,
llvm::Function *Fn,
PGO->verifyCounterMap();
+ if (CurCodeDecl->hasAttr<PersonalityAttr>()) {
+ StringRef Identifier =
+ CurCodeDecl->getAttr<PersonalityAttr>()->getRoutine()->getName();
+ llvm::FunctionCallee PersonalityRoutine =
+ CGM.CreateRuntimeFunction(llvm::FunctionType::get(CGM.Int32Ty, true),
----------------
compnerd wrote:
> I don't really see the problem here, as long as the compiler doesn't crash.
> If we define the function somewhere, the definition should override the type.
> And if the definition is wrong, that's not the compiler's problem; nobody
> should be using this attribute in the first place unless they know what
> they're doing.
I agree with you on this. We shouldn't crash on bad input, but I don't believe
that we currently crash.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185225
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
