================
@@ -1655,6 +1655,15 @@ void CodeGenFunction::GenerateCode(GlobalDecl GD,
llvm::Function *Fn,
PGO->verifyCounterMap();
+ if (CurCodeDecl->hasAttr<PersonalityAttr>()) {
+ StringRef Identifier =
+ CurCodeDecl->getAttr<PersonalityAttr>()->getRoutine()->getName();
+ llvm::FunctionCallee PersonalityRoutine =
+ CGM.CreateRuntimeFunction(llvm::FunctionType::get(CGM.Int32Ty, true),
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
It looks like Eli has better familiarity with this part of the patch so he can
finish up, I don't have a problem with the rest of it.
>but I don't believe that we currently crash.
Believe and 'test in our lit tests' are very different things :) I believe
Half Life 3 will be released AAAANY year now. :-P (I WAS right about DNF...)
To make ME comfortable, I'd like to see some codegen tests to prove that out,
that show emitted declarations before and after (basically the cartesean
product of those) we do the `createRuntimeFunction` call of the same name with
different signatures.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185225
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
