ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > and this line of PRs to add dependency scanning to the clang driver was the > main blocker for CMake C++ module support.
I didn't follow this. CMake already supports C++ modules. And I lack an interesting for this since I feel the feature is majorly used for using modules without a build system. But this is only common tutorial in my mind. @naveen-seth would you clarify > If we lack active maintainers willing to review modules patches, I just want > to throw out the idea that we should empower @naveen-seth to be the new C++ > module maintainer. I don't mind this. In my mind, the more maintainer, the better. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152770 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
