naveen-seth wrote: I wouldn’t mind this either 🙂. Admittedly, my knowledge of module internals/serialization is still shallow, but if that is no issue with the other modules maintainers, I'd be happy to.
> > and this line of PRs to add dependency scanning to the clang driver was the > > main blocker for CMake C++ module support. > > I didn't follow this. CMake already supports C++ modules. And I lack an > interesting for this since I feel the feature is majorly used for using > modules without a build system. But this is only common tutorial in my mind. > @naveen-seth could you clarify? I also don’t remember this being a main blocker; my understanding is that the CMake-team and other stakeholders mainly wanted the `clang-scan-deps` functionality to be available directly from `clang` itself ([[Modules] Bi-Weekly Meetup Notes, Feb 17, 2026](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/modules-bi-weekly-meetup-notes-feb-17-2026/89851)). I believe this was the reasoning: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76726#issuecomment-1874571241 (cc: @mathstuf, @Bigcheese). I’ll follow up on this in the next modules meeting and can draft an RFC afterward if there’s still interest. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152770 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
