pcc wrote: > Isn't #174995 the agreed upon direction to fix this?
That change seems to have some problems as I just noted in a comment there. This workaround is simpler at least, and avoids adding unnecessary data to the IR. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97685 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
