BaLiKfromUA wrote: @vbvictor thank you a lot for pointing out! IIRC this RFC was on my radar at some point but I missed follow up conversations.
I agree with reusing existing attribute since it would simplify our original goal to improve usage of `bugprone-unchecked-optional-access`. Do we need an RFC then in this case or just putting PR with parts of existing content and revisited design is enough? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/195054 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
