Thibault-Monnier wrote: > You have links to the previous failure? I find it concerning that we would > not be able to use ifuncs.
@cor3ntin it seems that @MaskRay was able to find a "bug" in glibc that explains our issues—thank you for the insight : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175452#issuecomment-4901399292. I'm afraid this means there is no way to move forward with ifuncs if we want to remain backwards-compatible (unless I misunderstand something which is totally possible). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180631 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
