================
@@ -111,25 +79,26 @@ struct StaticDiagInfoRec {
uint16_t WarnNoWerror : 1;
LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(bool)
uint16_t WarnShowInSystemHeader : 1;
+ LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(diag::Group)
+ uint16_t OptionGroupIndex : 14;
LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(bool)
uint16_t WarnShowInSystemMacro : 1;
-
- LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(diag::Group)
- uint16_t OptionGroupIndex : 15;
LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(bool)
uint16_t Deferrable : 1;
- uint16_t DescriptionLen;
+ uint16_t DescriptionOffsetLow;
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
This means we're not going to pack the bit-fields together. Actually, I
question whether `uint16_t` is a reasonable base type for the bit-field even
before the patch.
Should this have a bit-width?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/202624
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
