eleviant wrote: > Instead of introducing an attribute like this, can we just change how we pass > the value? For example, if we have a structure that's one byte, can we just > pass it as i8? > > The "bitwidth" attribute is a lot more complicated than this patch makes it > look, particularly the interactions with interprocedural optimizations.
Makes sense. Closing in favor of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/215264 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/214788 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
