AaronBallman wrote: > @shafik what was your goal cc'ing @MaskRay here? 🤔
I'm not Shafik but I can answer this. The [related RFC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-enable-fstack-clash-protection-by-default-for-android-targets/91223/) came up for discussion at the Clang Area Team meeting yesterday. We noted that there was a prior RFC on the same topic but with a broader focus and it had push back from @MaskRay, but he hadn't weighed in on the new RFC. We wanted to ensure he saw the new RFC given his previous concerns, in case those concerns applied even in the more narrow case. > I don't have more time for this one. Nick has approved it and owns the > Android policy call. The Clang Area Team felt that this is the Android maintainers' decision in this case, so if you're comfortable with it, we can accept the RFC formally. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
