shafik wrote: > > @shafik what was your goal cc'ing @MaskRay here? 🤔 > > I'm not Shafik but I can answer this. The [related > RFC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-enable-fstack-clash-protection-by-default-for-android-targets/91223/) > came up for discussion at the Clang Area Team meeting yesterday. We noted > that there was a prior RFC on the same topic but with a broader focus and it > had push back from @MaskRay, but he hadn't weighed in on the new RFC. We > wanted to ensure he saw the new RFC given his previous concerns, in case > those concerns applied even in the more narrow case.
Muy goal was bring visibility to potentially concerned parties as per the clang area team discussion. I think Aaron's more general comments reflect my feeling as well. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
