ilya-biryukov added a comment.

Sorry, not familiar enough with the AST bits yet to LGTM this.

Looks good from a higher-level perspective, though.
It's a bit of a shame that's it is still super-easy to write code that does not 
account for typo-corrected nodes. A more explicit approach, similar to 
non-canonical and sugared `Type`s, would probably be nicer, but getting there 
seems to be hard and may not be worth the effort.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D38708



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to