================
@@ -160,12 +162,14 @@ struct s11 {
 // CHECK-NEXT:         8 |   char b
 // CHECK-NEXT:           | [sizeof=16, align=8]
 
+#ifdef INT128_A
----------------
uweigand wrote:

Well, this is exactly the problem you run into by making the very availability 
of the `__int128_t` type dependent on a feature.  I still do not think this is 
a good idea.   But if you do have to do that, you could just check for the 
feature via `#ifdef __VX__` rather than introducing another define.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/223026
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to