hassnaaHamdi wrote: > > Hi @KRM7 Did you test the performance for thinLTO ? if the feature is > > useful for it, could you patch it out separately to simplify this patch ? > > I didn't run benchmarks for thin-LTO separately, only for regular LTO. Is > there a reason we would expect some meaningful difference and would want to > split this up into full/thin-LTO patches?
I mean if the feature is not useful for thin-LTO, then no reason to support it, right? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/233380 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
