sepavloff marked an inline comment as done.
sepavloff added a comment.

In, @pcc wrote:

> Why is this a driver flag? This seems like it ought to be a cc1-only flag to 
> me.

Yous are right, this is more like development option. But having the driver 
flag allows using compiler in builds with either option.
The option was hidden, probably it should be make hidden again.
If the backend will be changed so that it will not depend on IR type names, the 
default mode can be set to nameless types and the option can become -cc1 only.

  rC Clang

cfe-commits mailing list

Reply via email to