bcraig added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32411#1056381, @EricWF wrote:
> I spoke to STL on the MSVC team a while ago, and he stated that if we > produced a paper describing why we need `#include_next` and the rational > behind it, and they would pass that on to the front-end team. They didn't > guarantee that they would implement it, but that seems like a good first step. You had mentioned as much to me a year or so back in IRC. docs/DesignDocs/IncludeNextEmulation.rst is intended to be that document, but I can't find any emails where I actually sent that off. However, there is also my earlier comment... > Talked with mclow and some Microsoft devs in Albuquerque. I'm not expecting > include_next to show up in MSVC. https://reviews.llvm.org/D32411 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
