ilya-biryukov added a comment. ObjC++ definitely seems like a nicer default. Unfortunately, we'll start getting ObjC++ completion results, which may be confusing. But that seems like a smaller evil.
Is there an easy way to add a regression test that checks we don't get any errors for headers without compile command with C++/ObjC++ code? ================ Comment at: clangd/GlobalCompilationDatabase.cpp:24 + // Parsing as Objective C++ is friendly to more cases. + if (llvm::sys::path::extension(File) == ".h") + Argv.push_back("-xobjective-c++-header"); ---------------- Maybe use `.equals_lower(".h")` instead? Just in case. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D45442 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list email@example.com http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits