Szelethus added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/ctor-uninitialized-member.cpp:869
+void f44() {
+ ContainsUnionWithSimpleUnionTest2(); // xpected-warning{{1 uninitialized
field}}
+}
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> Hmm, shouldn't it say "expected"? Do these tests actually work?
Since unions are not yet supported by the CSA, this is only what would be
expected from this checker to find in the future. I purposely wrote 'xpected'
so tests wouldn't break.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45532
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
