asb added a comment. Herald added a subscriber: edward-jones. This is looking great, the only remaining code comment I have is that getExtensionFeatures needs a comment describing it.
The remaining issue I have is more of a spec issue - do canonical ordering requirements apply to extension categories? e.g. is sfoo_xbar illegal because it should be ordered xbar_sfoo? From my reading of the note below table 22.1 in the spec I think it is illegal and ordering of non-standard user-level vs standard supervisor-level vs nons-standard supervisor-level should be checked. Do you agree with my interpretation? https://reviews.llvm.org/D45284 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits