> On Nov 7, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Werner LEMBERG via cfe-users > <cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > >> The rule for determining when a base class function declaration >> introduced by a using-declaration is hidden by a derived class >> function declaration does not take the template parameter list into >> account: http://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udecl#15.sentence-1 > > Our main lilypond developer disagrees. He writes: > > This link states: > > When a using-declarator brings declarations from a base class into > a derived class, member functions and member function templates in > the derived class override and/or hide member functions and member > function templates with the same name, parameter-type-list, > cv-qualification, and ref-qualifier (if any) in a base class > (rather than conflicting). > > The parameter-type-list is a different one in this example since > they contain a different member function pointer type. Which is the > reason we need the whole hooplahoop in the first place. >
Isn’t it template-parameter-list that is different rather than parameter-type-list? http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#def:parameter-type-list http://eel.is/c++draft/temp#nt:template-parameter-list > For context, the whole lilypond thread starts at > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2018-11/msg00019.html > > > Werner > _______________________________________________ > cfe-users mailing list > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users _______________________________________________ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
