> Yes. The pieces are these: > > template > <typename T> // template-parameter-list > void f > (int N) // parameter-type-list > > Both base and derived function template have a parameter-type-list > of (). :(
Thanks for the analysis. I now wonder whether there is a work-around
to make the code work with clang also. Any ideas?
Werner
_______________________________________________
cfe-users mailing list
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
