>But this makes me wonder if another abstraction, say DEFBITFIELD >would be useful. Something like: The more expressive, the better IMHO.
>(defbitfield name
> (0 sym1 sym2 ...)
Never thought about it. But who says bitfields will soon say "arbitrary
width". Not everything is a single bit.
Regards,
Jörg Höhle.
_______________________________________________
cffi-devel mailing list
cffi-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
