"Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>(defbitfield name (0 sym1 sym2 ...) > Never thought about it. But who says bitfields will soon say > "arbitrary width". Not everything is a single bit.
Yeah, I thought about that so I don't plan to place any restrictions on the mask (so the user can use numbers other than 2^n). Only restriction that might make sense is to check if it's smaller that the canonical type's size. -- Luís Oliveira luismbo (@) gmail (.) com Equipa Portuguesa do Translation Project http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/registry.cgi?team=pt _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
