Jan Rychter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Apart from a plea for suggestions, this brings me back to my original > question -- can we expect any support for anonymous callbacks (closures > as callback functions) in CFFI, at least on SBCL to begin with?
I'm pretty sure we could support anonymous callbacks, on SBCL and CLISP anyway. Do any other Lisps support this? -- Luís Oliveira luismbo (@) gmail (.) com Equipa Portuguesa do Translation Project http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/registry.cgi?team=pt _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel