>>>>> "James" == James Bielman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: James> Jan Rychter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>>> "Luís" == Luís Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Luís> I'm pretty sure we could support anonymous callbacks, on SBCL >> Luís> and CLISP anyway. Do any other Lisps support this?
>> So, perhaps it is worth implementing as an optional >> feature. Hopefully other implementations will follow suit. James> I took a shot at implementing this on SBCL and CLISP (I don't James> have a working ECL installation), here's the patch: James> This still needs unit tests but cursory testing from the REPL James> looks good---please give it a try. It works for me in SBCL. Neat, thanks! However, I'm puzzled as to why you decided not to name the callback and remember it. Is there really no way to release the memory occupied by the trampoline code and let the closure be GCd when it's no longer needed? In my case, this is going to be a problem. If you generate a bunch of callback-lambdas for each context menu appearance, you will soon end up with lots of them in memory. If there really is no way to release them, I'll probably have to think of a different approach (with dispatching functions, I guess, as Martin suggested). --J. _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
