Thanks for the response. FSBV has grown a bit since I sent that email, and I agree with the principals you put in the bug report; i.e., if it's integrated correctly into CFFI it shouldn't require (any?) extra macros. That is why I wrote the macros to be as close to the CFFI form. In order to avoid extra macros while maintaining a separate system, it might be possible to provide a hook in CFFI and then have FSBV bind that hook if it's loaded.
BTW you might want to correct FSVB -> FSBV in the bug report and tags (stands for "by value") otherwise searches might miss it. Liam On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Luís Oliveira <luis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Liam, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Liam Healy <l...@healy.washington.dc.us> > wrote: >> If the keepers of CFFI are interested, I would be happy for it to >> be included in CFFI. In the meantime, it can be found here: >> http://repo.or.cz/w/fsbv.git > > This would indeed be nice to have in CFFI! I've registered this > wishlist item in <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cffi/+bug/622247>. > > -- > Luís Oliveira > http://r42.eu/~luis/ > _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
