On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Liam Healy <l...@healy.washington.dc.us> wrote: > Thanks for the response. FSBV has grown a bit since I sent that > email, and I agree with the principals you put in the bug report; > i.e., if it's integrated correctly into CFFI it shouldn't require > (any?) extra macros. That is why I wrote the macros to be as close to > the CFFI form. In order to avoid extra macros while maintaining a > separate system, it might be possible to provide a hook in CFFI and > then have FSBV bind that hook if it's loaded.
Indeed. I have added you to the cffi group at c-l.net so you can pursue this further. We can collaborate via launchpad or this mailing list, whichever you find more convenient. As a side note, it'd be great to leverage libffi for other features such as long-long or perhaps even its closure API. > BTW you might want to correct FSVB -> FSBV in the bug report and tags > (stands for "by value") otherwise searches might miss it. Oops, should be fixed now. -- Luís Oliveira http://r42.eu/~luis/ _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
